As I previously mentioned the film Hard Candy I thought it may be an interesting film to look at as it classed as a psychological thriller and it is extremely different to anyother film I have seen. Hard Candy won 5 awards and was nominated for 6. It is a film about a mature fourteen year old girl who meets a thirty two year old photographer on the internet.Suspecting that he is a pedophile, she goes back to his house in an attempt to expose him, however at the beginning the audience are unaware of this.
Definition of a psychological thriller according to Wikipedia
"Characters are no longer reliant on physical strength to overcome their brutish enemies (which is often the case in typical action-thrillers), but rather are reliant on their mental resources, whether it be by battling wits with a formidable opponent or by battling for equilibrium in the character's own mind. The suspense created by psychological thrillers often comes from two or more characters preying upon one another's minds, either by playing deceptive games with the other or by merely trying to demolish the other's mental state."
"Hard Candy is anything but sweet, following a 14-year-old girl as she torments a suspected paedophile in his own home. It’s a striking big screen debut for indie filmmaker David Slade whose crisp direction provides a great showcase for the fearless acting of Patrick Wilson (The Phantom Of The Opera) and the precocious Ellen Page. Together they pull off an extraordinary balancing act - a film that will have you both squirming in your seat and teetering on the edge of it.
...This is definitely a visceral rather than intellectual take on the subject of paedophilia, yet there is also an underpinning delicacy about the way the confrontations build and the measured approach of the actors. The final scene is a little disappointing, as it feels overly contrived, but Hard Candy lingers nonetheless."
What makes Hard Candy a thriller?
-Use of characters-Use of isolated location
-A mixture of muted colours, bright lights and low key lighting
- Use of diegetic sound
Analysis of Hard Candy and how David Slade uses aspects of the thriller genre
Slade uses large amount of thriller aspects within Hard Candy, of which I shall be interpreting and exploring in this short analysis.
This first scene is a close up of what we assume to be a computer screen; we see the conversation between "thonggrrrl14" and "lensman319" on an instant messaging site/programme. The use of names is instantly provoking, we question why has “thonggrrrl14” used such an alluring name and whether the number 14 is a reference to her age. This leaves the audience thinking that if 14 is her age then she surely is too young to be talking in such a way. Slade has used completely diegetic sounds including the tapping of the keyboard and a low humming which we can only assume is the humming of the computer, these sounds add both realism and intensity. When the conversation becomes more provocative “you oughta film me with that camera” the camera cuts to an extreme close up of the screen anticipating the reply. This scene is extremely tense and mysterious scene as we are unable to indentify who the characters are, how old they are and how long they have known each other etc, which is highly unsettling. This could be Slade’s reflection of internet dating, we are forced to anticipate people, be trusting and make presumptions, which later in the film we realise isn’t always a good thing.![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjmwxk4Aeag9HtsAe11ZZFpsAH2m9NErJI_v5K_wAjvBwIXxCD6p6SgnRbiIagWC2EKRUHoopNL776lFUxcDAMHjVkwxEEK8jXmR7q3WAgIbABVnoshGrI0Kd1RwPuOyI-GoMOsoHtnHg2X/s320/nighthawks+hard+candy.jpg)
The audience then sees a black screen until it cuts to a close up of a chocolate cake and we see a young girl slowly slicing the cake and almost suggestivley eating it. She makes noises of enjoyment as she is eating the cake and is left with chocolate on her lips, in this case the noises and chocolate are considered progotative and sexual, the camera zooms a close up of Jeffs face as he looks at Hayley in awe implying to the audience that he is infact a predator. This gives a very strong representation of woman as being highly sexually provacative however as she as we are not aware whether she is intentionally doing so this has been done to make the audience question society on age and sexuality, to create a contraversy and to also create an uncomfortable effect.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgcnVIiEG116cshyphenhyphenQlpS-y-Uodmwas9yvvbKp8CvJ_5dxKHFPJJ72B-h-AUJ994eDCac8eec7yWVQheLvrSjnRohnXhjt8BIzfEJ-t8kSf1MtEn_x0LgdRb29-oteo3fE_d6Aqo-hmfoMG-/s400/hayley+angelic.jpg)
In some way, Hayley could be considered as a slight femme fatale- a generic thriller character; due to her strength and power and her unconventional sexual appeal. At the beginning of the film Hayley is wearing red hooded jumper; an obvious connotation to danger which also could be a reference to Brother Grimms fairy tale "Little Red Riding Hood". However she is a femme fatale with a twist as she also uses her psychological strength, we as the audience are fooled into thinking she is a vunerable almost pathetic character like other woman characters in thriller films via light techniques and psychological games she plays which Slade puts through via the script.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhhyphenhyphen2piI7ZETIvqMjKNX9S6qtgTDduhGYxCppL0FwiVjU_lc7UpfuMguoHZ42Qz1hkHZ6tI4JReTzrU9EIHo429xLNh9mXwFOaRdWMTG4Y5yzlxucttmqFLrr0z568m4eyg2PFhOX7D-97K/s320/hard+candy+femme+fatale+kills+him.jpg)
Well done Maddie for posting this case study onto your blog. To strengthen your analysis I suggest you embed a clip from the film onto your blog or more stills in order to analyse the purpose and effect of lighting, sound, characterisation, locations, representation, (particularly representation of female as sexually provocative, for example is the female character objectified?).
ReplyDeleteLook at the sheet I gave you re film analysis - if you use the guidelines you could achieve an A grade for your analysis.
Mark Kermode's review in The Observer (18 June 2006) (see external reviews on imdb) may be worth engaging with. Also reading reviews from intelligent critics will raise your understanding of film grammar.
He calls the film a slasher/horror film so you must specifically reference clips which utilise conventions associated with thrillers.
Go for Level 4...A grade.
You can do extra work on this film by adding another post.